SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 841

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.S.NARAYANA
Gulam Ismail – Appellant
Versus
Mirza Ibrahim Ali Baig – Respondent


( 1 ) P. S. NARAYANA, J :the relief prayed for in these transfer CMPs is to transfer OS Nos. 490 of 1991 and 61 of 1990 on the file of V Additional Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad, to be tried along with OP Nos. 342 and 367 of 1992 pending on the file of the Chief Judge-cum- special Tribunal under the A. P. Land grabbing (Prohibition) Act, City Court, hydreabad in view of Section 7a (3) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (hereinafter in short referred to as the Act ). The historical background of the cases and several factual details have been narrated in the affidavits filed in support of the transfer cmps, which may not be necessary to be discussed in detail for the purpose of disposal of these transfer CMPs.

( 2 ) IN fact, in similar matter, one of us (P. S. Narayana, J) had already taken the view in Tr. CMP No. 388 of 2002 that the relief of this nature cannot be granted under Section 24 of the Code of Civil procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as the Code ) since the Special Court or the tribunal, as the case may be, constituted under the provisipns of the Act will not fall under Section 24 of the Code. Since the counsel representing the r






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top