SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 917

S.R.K.PRASAD
V. D. Solomon – Appellant
Versus
V. Solomon Mary – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS criminal revision case is directed against the order passed in M. C. No. 25 of 2002 on the file of the Family court, City Civil Court at Secunderabad, awarding maintenance of Rs. 1,000- to the wife being the first respondent herein and rs. 750/-each to the 3rd and 4th respondents and awarding Rs. 750. 00 towards maintenance from the date of petition up to September, 2002 to the 2nd respondent herein.

( 2 ) THE facts that arise for consideration can be briefly stated as follows: the first respondent herein is the wife of the revision petitioner and their marriage took place on 20-5-1976 as per Christian rights and customs and their marriage was consummated. Respondents 2 to 4 are the children born to them. Respondents have claimed maintenance against their father being the revision petitioner herein at the rate of Rs. 3,000. 00 per month to each petitioner alleging that the revision petitioner is working as P. C. 7497 and drawing salary of Rs. 8,000. 00 per month. A petition under section 32 of Indian Divorce Act is said to have been filed where under the Court has directed the first respondent to join the company of the revision petitioner. The wife is





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top