SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 874

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
K. Pedda Linga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
B. Sathaiah – Respondent


( 1 ) THE writ petition is filed by three individuals viz. , Bodupalli Sathaiah, Yata sathi Reddy and Akunuri Lakshmaiah, against the order dated 3-7-2000 passed by the Joint Collector, Nalgonda, under the A. P. Record of Rights in Land Act. The order passed by the Joint Collector, 15th respondent, was on an appeal preferred by respondents 1 to 12.

( 2 ) THE writ petition was listed for admission on 30-8-2000 and was adjourned to 4-9-2000. On 4-9-2000, the writ petition was admitted and in W. P. M. P. No. 20353 of 2000, an interim order of Status qua obtaining as on that date, was passed.

( 3 ) THEREAFTER, the petitioners and respondents 1 to 12 filed W. P. M. P. No. 9278 of 2002 under Order XXII Rule 3 read with section 151 CPC praying this court to record compromise in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise. Respective counsel representing the parties, vouched for the genuinity of signatures of the parties on the memorandum of Compromise as well as its contents. Acting on the same, this court passed the following order: "during pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners, on the one hand, and the respondent Nos. 1 to 12, on the other; have settled the matter among themselves, w









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top