SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 897

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.S.NARAYANA
R. Gnanakan, Chairman, evangelical Trust Association of south India, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Anita Aiddinyantz, Timpany School, Visakhapatnam – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE present Writ Appeal is directed against the order made by a learned Single judge in W. P. No. 11694/93 dt. 21-11-1996. The respondents 1, 2, 4, 8, 9 and 10 in the said Writ Petition are the appellants in the present Writ Appeal. The writ petitioner is the 1st respondent and respondents 2 to 5 in the Writ Appeal are respondents 3,5,6 and 7 in the Writ Petition.

( 2 ) THE 1st respondent/writ petitioner -Mrs. Anita aiddinyantz filed the Writ petition praying for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 in the Writ Petition to continue the petitioner as Principal of timpany School, Visakhapatnam till her superannuation by declaring the action of the 1st respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner as Principal of timpany School by the order dt. 10-8-1993, as illegal, arbitrary and unenforceable and for other appropriate orders.

( 3 ) THE 1st respondent in the Writ Appeal, the writ petitioner, is a trained Post graduate with teaching experience of 23 years and she was appointed as Principal of Timpany School on 5-2-1987 and her probation was declared and she was confirmed











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top