SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 989

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Devineni Seshagiri Rao – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner figured as an accused in Crime No. 498 of 1998 of machavaram Law and Order Police Station, vijayawada. He is accused of having committed offence under Section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The 3rd respondent lodged a complaint stating that the petitioner murdered his brother by name p. Ramakrishna.

( 2 ) THE 3rd respondent submitted a representation to the 1st respondent, the government of Andhra Pradesh, requesting them to appoint the 2nd respondent herein as Special Public Prosecutor to conduct the case in Cr. No. 498 of 1998. Acceding to the request of the 3rd respondent, the 1st respondent issued G. O. Ms. No. 217, Law department, dated 10-10-1998, appointing the 2nd respondent as Public Prosecutor, in exercise of power under Section 24 (8} of cr. P. C. (hereinafter referred to as the Code for short ). The said order is challenged in this writ petition.

( 3 ) THE petitioner contends that the 2nd respondent appeared in several cases for the deceased P. Ramakrishna. According to him, it is the 2nd respondent s acquaintance with and proximity to the deceased and his family, that























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top