SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 980

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Punna Prameela – Appellant
Versus
Reddimalla Yadagiri – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) ORDER :this case discloses an instance of a wrong order passed by the 2nd respondent giving rise to several unnecessary proceedings in various Courts.

( 2 ) THE District Collector, Nalgonda through proceedings dated 8. 1,2003 held that the 1st respondent, one R. Yadagiri ceased to be a Member of the Gram Panchayat, jajireddygudem with immediate effect and directed the Mandal Parishad Development officer, Arvapally to lodge a criminal Case against the 1st respondent for recovery of rs. 11,49,101/ -. The basis for this order is said to be that during his tenure as In-charge sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, the 1st respondent had misappropriated a sum of rs. 11,49,101/- and despite the notice as regards disqualification and recovery of amount, he did not respond. The order is said to have been passed in exercise of power under Sections 18 (2) and 19 (2) (h) (i) of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj act, 1994 (herein after referred to as the act ).

( 3 ) AGGRIEVED by the order dated 8. 1. 2003, the 1st respondent filed O. P. No. 1 of 2003 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, at Nakrekal (Full Additional Charge, suryapet ). The petitioner herein who is the sarp














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top