SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1017

V.V.S.RAO
A. Narsamma – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Ananthapur – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners claim to be the owners of land comprised in S. No. 436-1 admeasuring Acs. 4-46 cents situated in hindupur village. The 1st respondent issued notification under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ( the Act for brevity) proposing to acquire land for a public purpose for establishment of Autonagar in Hindupur. A copy of the notification was published in the local newspapers on 7. 11. 2001. Thereafter, a declaration was published under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Act on 30. 3. 2002. These two notifications are assailed in this Writ Petition.

( 2 ) IT is contended that the notification issued under Section 4 (1) and the declaration made under Section 6 (1) of the Act by the district Collector are without jurisdiction. Secondly, it is urged that the declaration was made as if the land is being acquired for the purpose of establishment of autonagar at Hindupur whereas the notification published in the newspapers under Section 4 (1) shows that the land is proposed to be acquired for providing house sites to persons belonging to weaker sections.

( 3 ) IN the counter-affidavit filed along with the vacate stay applicat







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top