SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1039

V.V.S.RAO
P. Gyan Chander – Appellant
Versus
Secunderabad Cantonment Board – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner claims that he allegedly purchased plot No. 17, admeasuring 232 Sq. yards in S. No. 157/9 (New S. No. 157/ 10) situated at Thokatta Village, secunderabad, by registered sale deed dated 16. 8. 1982. According to the petitioner plot no. 17 forms part of layout approved by Secunderabad Cantonment Board in favour of Government Press Employees co-operative House Building Society limited, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad (for short, the Society ). The petitioner approached the first respondent by making an application on 18. 12. 1999 for construction of residential building. By letter dated 30. 12. 1999 first respondent rejected the request for building permission on the ground that the plot does not form part of the sanctioned layout. Assailing this order, present writ petition is filed.

( 2 ) THE writ petition is opposed by first respondent by filing counter-affidavit. In the counter-affidavit filed by the executive Officer of the Cantonment board, it is stated that the layout in favour of the Society was sanctioned in 1987 and therefore the petitioner could not have purchased plot No. 17 in the lay out sanctioned in 1987 which has shown the same as owner s









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top