SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1074

D.S.R.VERMA
M. Sarojini – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , rep. by Secretary, Municipal Administration – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed seeking writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to lr. No. 2669/mp2/huda/97 dated 8-6-1399 by HUDA and consequential letter no. G/129/bp/1777/97, dated 19-6-1999, of serilingampally Municipality and P. O. No. G/1/uc/mcs/tps/2000-2001, dated 4-12-2000 , of Serilingampally Municipality and quash the same.

( 2 ) THE facts, which are not in dispute, are that, the petitioners who are 27 in number purchased different extents of land totalling to Ac. 4. 70 guntas from one P. Sarveshwara rao in Sy. Nos. 55 to 59 of Madhapur Village under registered sale deeds. All the petitioners made a joint application for development of the land to the 2nd respondent-Hyderabad Urban Development authority (for short the Hilda ) through letter, dated 4-7-1996. Upon which the 2nd respondent through letter dated 10-6-1997 directed the petitioners to remit an amount of rs. 8,00,000/- towards development charges. Further the 2nd respondent also required the petitioners to submit affidavits that the land in the lay out application is within the urban land ceiling exemptions in terms of G. O. Ms. No. 733 and the total land held by them does not ex

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top