SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1093

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
Satyamsetti Somaraju – Appellant
Versus
Ramisetti Naidu alias Venkata Rao – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against judgment dated 21-3-1994 in A. S. No. 19 of 1993 on the file of Subordinate judge, Peddapuram, confirming the order and decree dated 6-8-1993 in E. A. No. 104 of 1990 in E. P. No. 147 of 1989 in O. S. No. 52 of 1985 on the file of District Munsiff, prathipadu. The claimant is the appellant.

( 2 ) NECESSARY facts for the disposal of this appeal are as follows : first respondent decree holder obtained a money decree against second respondentjudgment debtor. During the pendency of suit, the decree-holder attached before judgment some property said to be belonging to defendant-judgment debtor. The attachment was effected on 5-5-1985. Thereupon during the pendency of the suit itself the appellant filed I. A. No. 322 of 1985 under Order 38, Rule 8, C. P. C. , seeking raising of attachment on the ground that the appellant is the owner of the said property, he purchased the said property under a regular registered sale deed dated 21-2-1985 and the second respondent judgment debtor had no interest or right over the said property. The said attachment raising petition in I. A. No. 322 of 1985 stood dismissed for default of appellant






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top