SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1125

V.V.S.RAO
Venkatreddi – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Land Reforms and Urban Land Ceilings and Appellate Authority, Hyderabad – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner claims to be absolute owner of the land admeasuring about acs. 21. 90 gts. comprised in Sy. Nos. 123 to 127, 130, 132, 133, 136 and 137 situated at Nanakramguda village, Serilingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

( 2 ) HE asserts that they are agricultural dry and wet lands which are being cultivated till now. After coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and regulation) Act, 1976 ( the ULC Act for brevity), the petitioner filed a declaration under Section 6 (1) of the ULC Act before the second respondent claiming the lands to be agricultural lands and, therefore, they cannot be declared as vacant lands under the ULC Act. After processing the declaration, the second respondent issued a draft statement under Section 8 (1) of the ULC Act on 28-9-1977 accepting the claim of the petitioner in respect of the lands in Sy. Nos. 123 to 127, 132, 133 and 137 to an extent of Acs. 10. 20 gts. which stood excluded from cultivation as per Section 2 (o) of the ULC Act. However, the second respondent treated the land comprised in Sy. Nos. 130 and 136 admeasuring an extent of 46,135 Sq. mtrs. as vacant land. It was for the reason that during the perio
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top