SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1126

V.V.S.RAO
Mullapudi Satyam – Appellant
Versus
Sub Collector, Vijayawada, Krishna District – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THERE are 192 petitioners in this writ petition. They filed the writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Sub-Collector, Vijayawada (first respondent), Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), Vijayawada (second respondent) and Village Administrative Officer, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada, in seeking to dispossess them from their lands admeasuring Acs. 8. 92 cents in R. S. No. 17/5, 24/5, 26/2, 34/1, 35/1, 36/1, 37/1 and 39/1 of Bhavanipuram village, Vijayawada, hereafter called the petition schedule land, contrary to the observations made by this Court that the petitioners are not bound by the judgment in l. G. O. P. No. 335 of 1983 as illegal and contrary to law. They also seek further orders as the Court deems fit.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioners is very short. In the affidavit filed by the first petitioner on behalf of other petitioners, they stated as follows. Respondents 4 to 11 herein filed L. G. O. P. No. 335 of 1983 against third parties praying the special Tribunal constituted under A. P. Land Grabbing (Protection) Act, 1982 seeking eviction of those persons from the petition land on the ground that they are land grabbers. The Special Tr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top