SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1158

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, G.BIKSHAPATHY
P. Chandra Sekhar Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Correspondent, SSRSO Upper Primary school, Srikalahasthi – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J, J.

( 1 ) THE batch of writ petitions and contempt cases can be disposed of by a common order as they arise out of a common order passed by the Andhra pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O. A. No. 377 of 2001 and batch, dated 13-6-2002.

( 2 ) IT is necessary to trace out few facts before going into the respective merits of the contentions, which were raised by the learned Counsel for both the parties.

( 3 ) THE applicants filed O. A. No. 377 of 2001 and batch before the Tribunal, challenging the validity of G. O. Ms. No. 176, dated 22-12-2000 by which, the orders issued by the Government in G. O. Ms. No. 330, dated 10-8-1983 were cancelled. They also prayed for further relief of fixing their pay scales without reference to the cut off date fixed in G. O. Ms. No. 330, dated 10-8-1983.

( 4 ) IT is the case of the petitioners that they were appointed as Language Pandits grade-II in Government as well as local bodies. They also possessed the qualifications required for the posts of Language Pandits grade-II. It is their case that in respect of other S. G. B. T. teachers, who possessed the qualifications of School Assistants, they were granted the scale of School Assista






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top