SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1193

P.S.NARAYANA
Chenna Reddy – Appellant
Versus
D. Venkata Reddy – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant herein, Chenna Reddy, the 1st defendant in O. S. No. 60/92 on the file of principal junior Civil Judge, Hindupur and 1 st respondent in A. S. No. 27/99 on the file of senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, had preferred the present Second Appeal, aggrieved by the reversing Judgment and decree made in a. S. No. 27/99 on the file of Senior Civil judge, Hindupur.

( 2 ) THE respondent herein, Venkat Reddy filed O. S. No. 60/92 on the file of the Principal junior Civil Judge, Hindupur for the relief of permanent injunction relating to the plaint schedule property as against defendants 1 to 3. The 3rd defendant was set ex parte. The appellant 1 st defendant filed written statement and an adoption memo was filed by the 2nd defendant.

( 3 ) ON the strength of the respective pleadings of the parties, lssues were settled. In the Court of first instance, on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff, P. W. 1 to P. W. 3 were examined and Exs. A-1 to A-5 were marked. Likewise, on behalf of the defendants 1 and 2, D. W. 1 to D. W. 3 were examined and exs. B-1 to B-8 were marked. On appreciation of the oral and documentary evidence, the Court of first instance had dismissed t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top