SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1177

V.V.S.RAO
S. Varalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
District Cooperative Office, Hyderabad – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the wife of one Satyanarayana. It appears, the third respondent availed a loan in an amount of Rs. 3,50,000/- from the second respondent for the purpose of dairy business. The petitioner s husband mortgaged the property being a residential house to secure the loan. There was a default in payment of the loan amount. The second respondent bank which is a co-operative bank, governed by the A. P. Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies act,1995 (for short a. P. MAC Act ), filed original petition being O. P. No. 8 of 2000 under Section 37 of the said Act before the A. P. Co-operative Tribunal, hyderabad (hereafter called the Tribunal ) for recovery of the loan. The said o. P. was filed against the petitioner s husband, her son and herself. Even after receipt of the notice, the petitioner and others did not appear before the tribunal. Therefore, the Tribunal passed an order directing the third respondent and the petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs. 15,17,641/- together with interest at 6% from the date of the said Award. The Award dated 26-8-2000 became final. After obtaining the order/award of the Tribunal, the second respondent approached the fi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top