GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff-petitioner herein has preferred the above two CRPs. , against the common order passed in IA nos. 1217 of 2001 and 1218 of 2002 in an unnumbered Original Suit, on 7-8-2002 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Khammam.

( 2 ) THE backdrop of the case leading to the filing of these revision petitions, is that the plaintiff-petitioner filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 2,00,120/- under the Hire purchase agreement, dated 25-7-1997 against the defendants. The plaintiff-petitioner filed the suit on 2-6-2001 and the plaint was returned on 6-6-2001 to comply the following defects by granting 10 days time. 1. Document No. 9 not filed. 2. Document Serial numbers be correctly noted. 3. DC Fof Rs. 110/- be paid. 4. Documents showing the payments shall be filed. 5. Summons, R. P. and process be filed. 6. Date of all documents be mentioned in list of documents.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff-petitioner represented the plaint on 10-6-2001 stating that the objections were complied with. The said plaint was again returned on 21-6-2001 pointing out that objections 1 to 6 were not complied with and 10 days time was granted for compliance of the same. But, the plaintiff-p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document