( 1 ) THESE two revision petitions arose out of the orders passed by the Subordinate Judge, Anakapalli, in E. P. 31 of 1984 and 32 of 1984 respectively in O. S. 65 of 1976. The revision petitioner is one of the partners of the plaintiff- decree holder Firm and the respondent is the defendant in the suit and Judgment debtor in the execution petition. The Firm of the revision petitioner filed the suit for recovery of money on the basis of a promissory note and the suit was decreed in its favour. Subsequently, the revision petitioner filed E. P. Nos. 31 of 1984 and 32 of 1984 for different reliefs for the purpose of realization of the decree amount. These execution petitions were dismissed by the lower Court on the ground that they cannot be maintained by an individual partner when the suit was decreed in favour of the firm.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioner being aggrieved by the orders of the lower Court preferred these two revision petitions questioning their validity and legality. The suit was filed by a firm known as M/s. Poosarla Visweswararao and Brothers. It was decreed in favour of the firm. Subsequently, the firm was dissolved. After the dissolution of the firm