SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1275

P.S.NARAYANA
Uppalapati Subrahmanyam Raju – Appellant
Versus
Uppalapati Sanyasi Satya Venkata Appala Raju – Respondent


( 1 ) THE revision petitioner aggrieved by the order made by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram dated 18-7-2003 in F. D. I. A. No. 572 of 2002 in O. S. No. 17 of 1997, had preferred the present civil revision petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as hereunder:the revision petitioner as plaintiff filed a suit in O. S. No. 17 of 1997 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram for the relief of partition and separate possession of his 1/3rd share praying for the division of properties into three equal shares by metes and bounds. The learned Senior Civil judge, Vizianagaram had decreed the suit on 26. 4. 2002. The revision petitioner, as plaintiff aggrieved by the fact that the relief of mesne profits had not been granted, preferred A. S. No. 1991 of 2002 on the file of this Court and the same is pending disposal. In the said appeal, in C. M. P. No. 20657 of 2002, initially interim stay of passing of final decree was granted and subsequent thereto the same was vacated, the respondents herein-defendants moved an application in F. D. I. A. No. 572 of 2002 in o. S. No. 17 of 1997 under Order 20 Rule 18 of the Civil Procedu












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top