SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1326

P.S.NARAYANA
Bogirouthu Suryakantham – Appellant
Versus
Kandhi Sanyasinaidu – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri O. Manohar reddy, the learned Counsel representing the petitioners and Sri P. R. Prasad, the learned counsel representing the respondents.

( 2 ) THE civil revision petition is filed as against an order made in LA. No. 1705 of 2003 in O. S. No. 155 of 1996 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Vizianagaram.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs in the above said suit moved an application before the Court below in LA. No. 1705 of 2003 under Order 6, rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Rule 28 of civil Rules of Practice praying to permit them to amend the plaint by inserting para IIl (g) (i ). The learned Judge after recording the reasons had ultimately dismissed the said application. Assailing the same, the present civil revision petition is preferred.

( 4 ) SRI O. Manohar Reddy, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the main ground on the basis of which the learned Additional District Judge, vizianagaram had dismissed the application is the decision of this Court in Kondagani rajeshwar Rao v Gandu Sammaiah, 2003 (3) ALD 97 = 2003 (1) An. WR 616. The learned Counsel further submitted that the said decision h








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top