SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1349

V.V.S.RAO
V. Narsing Raj – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , 84 (2), Endowment Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) A short question of considerable importance would arise for consideration in this writ petition. Whether the civil court is entitled to pass an order of injunction in a suit field under sub-section (2) of Section 84 of the A. P. Charitable and Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 ( the Act ) against the order of the Deputy commissioner of Endowments passed under Section 83 (1) of the Act is the question. This question arises in the following background facts.

( 2 ) THE petitioner claims to be in possession of premises bearing No. 1-7-30, alwal. It is his case that the land and the premises does not belong to Vara Vara narsing Rao Dharmashala of Sri Balaji venkateswara Temple (hereafter called the temple ) and that when he obtained permission from the Alwal Panchayat for the purpose of constructing compound wall and renovation of the structure, the temple did not object for it.

( 3 ) THE Assistant Commissioner, endowments Departments, Ranga Reddy district submitted a report to the Deputy commissioner, the third respondent herein, inter alia stating that premises No. 1-7-30 situated at Alwal belongs to the temple, that the petitioner herein is









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top