SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1385

S.R.K.PRASAD
Bommidi Mallikharjuna @ Malka – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises against the judgment rendered by the assistant Sessions Judge, Kothagudem, in S. C. No. 73 of 1996 convicting and sentencing the accused to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years each for the offence under Section 395 IPC.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution can be stated in brief as follows: on the night of 3-7-1995 P. W. I and his wife, P. W. 2 and Madireddy Swarnasree were sleeping in the varandah of the house. At about mid-night P. W. I got up and found six persons coining towards his house. They came, tied the hands of P. W. I and slapped Anjireddy and broke open the door, entered the house and committed theft of 15,000/-rupees cash, a watch as well as the gold ear studs and nose ring of Gampa anasuya. Similar offence was made in the house of P. W. 3, P. W. 4 and others. On the strength of a complaint given by P. W. 1, Police registered Ex. P-24 FIR. On 31-10-1995 at about 3. 00 p. m. A-l and A-5 were arrested, and on the strength of the confessions said to have been made by A-l and A-5 other accused were arrested and properties were recovered. P. W. I2 conducted the test identification parade in respect of A-l to A-








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top