SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1417

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
Sirugudi Adinarayana – Appellant
Versus
Bodla Mariamma – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 22-7-2003 made in LA. No. 476 of 2003 in O. S. No. 720 of 2001 by the learned I Additional Junior civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

( 2 ) THE learned Trial Judge partly allowed the application filed by the petitioner herein under Order VIII Rule I (3) of the code of Civil Procedure (for short the code ) to receive certain documents. The learned Trial Judge having allowed the application in part received documents 1 to 3, 5 and 9 only on payment of costs of Rs. 50. 00 to the other side. The learned trial Judge did not receive the documents 4 and 6 to 8 on the ground that some of them are not admissible in evidence and some are merely Xerox copies.

( 3 ) IN this civil revision petition, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri p. Satyanarayana, contended that the learned judge committed an error in deciding the question as to the admissibility of the documents even at the threshold stage and the same is impermissible in law. The learned Counsel contended that while considering the application to receive the documents, the Trial Court is required to see as to whether sufficient cause is shown fo










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top