SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1468

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Mohd. Sajid Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
R. Prathap – Respondent


C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) SINCE common questions of fact and law arise in these three petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) IN all these three cases proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments act were initiated against the petitioners by the first respondent in the respective petitions, in which summons were issued to them. They, without being present on the day of first hearing, filed petitions seeking exemption from their personal attendance. Those petitions were allowed and the cases were adjourned. On that date of adjournment also petitioners were absent and they again filed petitions to condone their absence. They also field petitions seeking permission to be represented through their counsel in the respective cases. The learned Magistrate, holding that in view of Section 251 Cr. P. C. he has to furnish copies to the accused and should also examine them to find out if they plead guilty or not, after putting the substance of the accusations against them, dismissed those petitions. Those orders of dismissal are the subject matter of these petitions.

( 3 ) THE contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in view of the rat





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top