SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1486

V.ESWARAIAH
R. V. Bhuvaneswari – Appellant
Versus
Ponnuboina Chencu Ramaiah (died) – Respondent


V. ESWARAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners herein are the plaintiffs. They filed the suit O. S. No. 63 of 2001 for partition of the plaint schedule joint family properties, and to allot the shares, for which they are entitled, by passing a preliminary decree. After numbering the suit, the Office of the Senior Civil Judge, kavali, in the said O. S. No. 63 of 2001 putup a check slip stating that the said suit is for partition of plaint schedule properties and for allotment of shares of Plaintiffs 1 and 2 and defendants and also for permanent injunction restraining Defendants 1 to 4 and 7 from making any attempts to raise constructions over any portion of the plaint schedule property. As per the averment in the plaint, Defendants 1 to 4 sold some of the plaint schedule properties to D-7. Therefore, the plaintiffs are not entitled to joint possession and enjoyment of such portion of the schedule property and thus the plaintiffs are liable to pay Court fee under Section 34 (1) of A. P. Court Fees and suit Valuation Act, 1956 (for short "the act" ).

( 2 ) ON the office check slip, the learned senior Civil Judge, Kavali, made an order on 1. 11. 2002, directing the petitioners herein to pay the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top