SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1527

G.BIKSHAPATHY, S.ANANDA REDDY
Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare, Govt. of India – Appellant
Versus
R. Rama Murthy – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE issue that arises for consideration in the Writ Petition is "what is the mode of calculation of restoration of pension in respect of the employees covered by rule 37-A of C. C. S. Pension Rules, 1972 (for brevity Pension Rules ).

( 2 ) THE practical implementation of the rule is the moot question in this case. The respondent-employee was not an applicant before the tribunal. He filed an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal in o. A. NO. 1345 of 2001 challenging the Order issued by the Accountant General, Orissa, dated:9. 5. 2000 fixing the quantum of pension restored after a period of 15 years under the Pension Rules. It was his case that he was appointed as U. D. C. in the office of Accountant General, Orissa in Puri branch and he was subsequently promoted as Accounts Officer on 7. 4. 1964. He was sent on deputation to Computer maintenance Corporation after his name was selected by the Comptroller and Auditor general of India. In the said Corporation he was appointed as Accounts Manager in hyderabad division and subsequently the applicant was permanently absorbed from 1. 6. 1979. Thus, he served the Central government from 27. 11. 1950



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top