G.BIKSHAPATHY, S.ANANDA REDDY
Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare, Govt. of India – Appellant
Versus
R. Rama Murthy – Respondent
( 1 ) THE issue that arises for consideration in the Writ Petition is "what is the mode of calculation of restoration of pension in respect of the employees covered by rule 37-A of C. C. S. Pension Rules, 1972 (for brevity Pension Rules ).
( 2 ) THE practical implementation of the rule is the moot question in this case. The respondent-employee was not an applicant before the tribunal. He filed an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal in o. A. NO. 1345 of 2001 challenging the Order issued by the Accountant General, Orissa, dated:9. 5. 2000 fixing the quantum of pension restored after a period of 15 years under the Pension Rules. It was his case that he was appointed as U. D. C. in the office of Accountant General, Orissa in Puri branch and he was subsequently promoted as Accounts Officer on 7. 4. 1964. He was sent on deputation to Computer maintenance Corporation after his name was selected by the Comptroller and Auditor general of India. In the said Corporation he was appointed as Accounts Manager in hyderabad division and subsequently the applicant was permanently absorbed from 1. 6. 1979. Thus, he served the Central government from 27. 11. 1950
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.