SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1534

G.YETHIRAJULU
B. P. Venkata Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Y. Obanna – Respondent


G. YETHIRAJULU, J.

( 1 ) THESE revision petitions have been preferred by the declarant in C. C. No. 2242/ alg/75 of the Sub Collector, Nandyal, against the orders of the Land Reforms appellate Tribunal, dated 26-7-1999, in lr. A. No. 34 of 1994 and 35 of 1994. The declarant was a surplus holder, therefore, he surrendered certain lands and they were assigned to the respondents in both these revision petitions prior to 30-4-1977 and the respondents are in possession and enjoyment of the same.

( 2 ) SUBSEQUENTLY, on 1-2-1980 the Land reforms Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the declarant covered by l. R. A. No. 123 of 1979, holding him as a non-surplus holder. The declarant filed an application on 28-6-1993 for redelivery of the surrendered lands. Therefore, on 16-9-1993, the Sub Collector, Nandyal, passed an order, directing the restoration of the lands, which were assigned to the respondents. The respondents being aggrieved by the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, dated 16-9-1993 preferred L. R. A. No. 34 of 1994 and 35 of 1994 before the Land reforms Appellate Tribunal, Kurnool. The land Reforms Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals, by observing that the declarant k












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top