SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1535

A.GOPAL REDDY
Priya Paul Yedluri – Appellant
Versus
N. T. R. University of Health Sciences – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) ALL these writ petitions can be dealt with under a common order, since the controversy in all the writ petitions is interlinked with one another.

( 2 ) THE Supreme Court in Convener, mbbs/bds Selection Board v. Chandan mishra fully endorsed the view taken by the orissa High Court, which reads as under:"the learned judges of the High Court, if we may say so with respect in a well considered opinion expressed their anguish at the insensitivity of the authorities administering medical admission in the State to the need to prevent occasions for repetitive grievances from the student community and had occasion to observe : "shakespeare in Othello has written chaos is come again . This Court has witnessed chaos almost annually when time for admission to MBBS/bds courses came".

( 3 ) THE State of Andhra Pradesh is not an exception to the same.

( 4 ) THE Apex Court in Medical Council of india v. Madhu Singh after taking note of the above observation in order to maintain excellence particularly, in the medical field, to prevent admission in the midst which will disturb the course and also work as handicap to the candidates themselves fixed time schedule. In para - 2




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top