SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1539

BILAL NAZKI
Saramekala Anjaneyulu – Appellant
Versus
Kurra Sambrajyam – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision filed against an order passed by the Trial Court dismissing the application filed by the defendant under Order VII, Rule 11 C. P. C. Defendant wanted the plaint to be rejected on the ground that sufficient Court-fee had not been paid by the plaintiff. Plaintiff filed the suit for cancellation of a document, which is a sale deed. The value of the property, according to the sale deed, is rs. 12,00,000/ -. The plaintiff filed the suit claiming one-seventh share in the property. He prayed in the suit:" (A) to pass a decree that the registered sale deed dated 13. 6. 2003, registered document No. 344/03 at SRO, mangalagiri, executed by Defendants nos. 1 and 2 in favour of 7th defendant is Sham. nominal and collusive, null and void and it cannot restrict the rights of plaintiff in respect of l/7th share in favour of her father s half share of undivided plaint schedule property; (b) for cancellation of the document; (c) to partition the plaint schedule property in 7 equal shares and one such share to the plaintiff and to deliver and put her in separate possession of the property; (d) for mesne profits from the date of suit till the date of realizatio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top