C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) SINCE both the C. M. As. arise out of the same Judgment and since the parties to both the C. M. As. are one and the same, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience the parties would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court.

( 3 ) PLAINTIFF filed the suit for a declaration that she is the legally wedded wife of the 1st defendant and consequently to direct the 2nd defendant to incorporate her name as the wife of the 1st defendant in its records in place of g. Koteswaramma, whose name is recorded as his wife in their records.

( 4 ) THE case of the plaintiff in brief is that the marriage between her and the 1st defendant took place on 17-10-1966, and that out of the three children they begot, out of their wedlock, one daughter only is alive, and from a few years prior to the suit 1st defendant, by neglecting her, allegedly that he married one Koteswaramma as his second wife nominated her as his wife in the records of the 2nd defendant, the employer of the 1st defendant. The case of the 1st defendant is that he, who was married to Manoharam, a relative of plaintiff, only developed intimacy with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document