SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 21

V.V.S.RAO, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, A. P. , Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Kulkarni – Respondent


( 1 ) BEING aggrieved against the order rendered in Writ Petition No. 18021 of 2001 dated 12-10-2001, the above appeal was preferred by the Regional Provident Fund commissioner, A. P. and another. The respondent - Deepak Kulkarni is a member of the provident fund by virtue of his employment in M/s. Bakelite Hylam limited. He submitted a claim in Form 10-D of Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 in June, 2000 for payment of disablement pension. He was referred to Regional Medical Board, gandhi Hospital for the medical examination and report and a certificate about the nature and percentage of the disablement to decide the eligibility for disablement pension under the Employees pension Scheme, 1995 which is framed under the Employees Provident Fund and miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The medical Board issued a report and certificate after examining the respondent herein by letter dated 4-4-2001. The Medical Board certified that the case of the respondent is a permanent disability of 75 to 80%. The case of the respondent was rejected by the second appellant since the disability although permanent, is only to the extent of 75 to 80%, but not total i. e. 100%. According to the respondent,
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top