SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 26

L.NARASIMHA REDDY, S.R.NAYAK
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
B. Komaraiah – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ appeal/ the State of Andhra pradesh challenges the order of the learned single Judge in WP. No. 3219/95 dated 13-11-1995.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the relevant facts are asunder: the respondents jointly owned an extent of Ac. 6-06 cents of agricultural land in sy. No. 578 of Uppal Kalan Revenue Village of Ranga Reddy District. The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) became applicable to the State of Andhra Pradesh with effect from 17-2-1996 (sic. 1976 ). Hyderabad is one of the Urban agglomerations declared under the Act in the State of Andhra Pradesh as is evident from Schedule 1 appended to the Act. The land of the respondents fell within the urban agglomeration. The respondents claimed that they are using the said land for the purpose of agriculture. However, since the land is within the urban agglomeration, they filed a declaration as required under section 6 of the Act.

( 3 ) THE declaration filed by therespondents was processed by the 2nd appellant and ultimately an order under section 8 (4) of the Act was passed by him on 7-4-1990 deciding that the respondents hold a extent of 11439. 50 sq


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top