SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 50

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Venu Reddy Chandrasekhara Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision under Section 21 of the A. P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed declaration as required under Section 8 of the Act in respect of the lands held by him. The Land Reforms Tribunal, Nellore (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ) decided that the petitioner holds 1. 2593 Standard Holdings of land in excess of ceiling limits. The matter was carried in appeal before the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Nellore (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate Tribunal ). Thereafter the petitioner filed CRP No. 4206/92 in this Court. One of the controversies in that revision was whether the land admeasuring Ac. 22-00 covered by agreement of sale dated 2-1-1971 was liable to be excluded from the holding of the petitioner. Since there was no definite finding as to whether it was the declarant or the agreement holder that was in possession of the said land, this Court, through orders dated 24-6-1987, remanded the matter to the Appellate Tribunal to record a finding as to who is in possession of the said land. The Appellate Tribunal in turn, through its ord














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top