SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 231

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Rayaprolu Narayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Rayaprolu Ramakrishna Sarma – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this Second Appeal, the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court dated 19-9-1989 in A. S. No. 66 of 1983 reversing that of the trial Court dated 26-3-1983 in os. No. 504 of 1980 are in challenge. The plaintiff is the appellant. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as arrayed in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the suit for partition. The plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3 are the sons of late Rayaprolu Chalapathi. It was the case of the plaintiff that the 3rd defendant by name Rayaprolu Rama Krishna Sharma was given in adoption to one Rayaprolu China krishna Murthy. The joint family comprising of the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 owned a house bearing Door no. 10-3-48 in Nageshwara Rao Street. Ramaraopet, Kakinada. According to the appellant, the 3rd defendant was not entitled to any share in the partition since he was given in adoption. The 3rd defendant contested the suit. He disputed the alleged adoption and claimed a share in the schedule property along with his other brothers who figured as plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2.

( 3 ) NECESSARY issues were framed by thetrial Court. On behalf of the plaintiff, P. Ws.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top