SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 137

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, Y.V.NARAYANA
Teja Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Council of Higher Education, Hyderabad – Respondent


AR. LAKSHMANAN, C. J.

( 1 ) HEARD Mr. N. Sridhar Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ petitioner -Appellant, the learned Additional Advocate-General for the 1st respondent, Mr. Narayana Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the Kakatiya University-2nd respondent and Mr. Satyam Reddy, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 3.

( 2 ) PETITIONER in the writ petition is the appellant herein. It is an Educational Society running a Degree College in Madhira, Khammam District, affiliated to the Kakatiya University, the second respondent herein. The third respondent herein is another Educational Society running a High School and a Junior College in Madhira. While so, the third respondent applied for permission to the first respondent, the Andhra Pradesh State Council for Higher Education, A. P. , Hyderabad to start a new Degree College in Madhira to run B. Sc. , and B. Com. (Computer) Courses. Resisting grant of permission on various grounds, the appellant filed a representation dated 4. 5. 2001 before the first respondent. As the said representation was not disposed of, he filed a Writ petition being W. P. No. 9464 of 2003 which was disposed of by an order dated 15. 5. 2001 with a direction t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top