SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 306

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Sagi Bangarraju – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Visakhapatnam – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this Second Appeal, an important question of law falls for consideration. The defendant in O. S. No. 230/72 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, visakhapatnam is the appellant.

( 2 ) THE respondent filed the suit for recovery of an amount of Rs. 9,996/- through a preliminary decree for redemption of mortgage. The suit was decreed on 31-7-1973. Four months time was granted for the appellant herein for payment of the amount failing which the property was to have been brought under sale. The appellant paid an amount of Rs. 3. 000/- after decree.

( 3 ) THE respondent filed LA. No. 939/76 under Section 152 C. P. C, for correction of the decree on the ground that the decree drawn by the trial Court was not in conformity with the prescribed form. The LA. was ordered on 21-4-1979. Thereafter, the respondent filed LA. No. 101/81 on 18-11-1980 for final decree proceedings. The Executing Court dismissed the LA. as time barred through its order dated 24-8-1983.

( 4 ) THE respondent filed A. S. No. 119/85 against the order in IA. No. 101/81 in the court of the III Additional District Judge, visakhapatnam. The lower appellate Court through its judgment d













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top