SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 295

S.R.K.PRASAD, S.R.NAYAK
Revenue Divisional Officer, East, ranga Reddy Dist – Appellant
Versus
Kasula Sathaiah – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal by the Revenue divisional Officer and the Mandal Revenue officer is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 14-7-2000 made in Writ Petition No. 5848/99.

( 2 ) THE respondents herein were the petitioners in the said writ petition. In the writ petition, they sought implementation of the alleged patta said to have been given to them assigning 4. 00 acres of land (2 acres each to the petitioners) of Kapra village, keesara Mandal, R. R. District comprised in survey No. 199/1 vide Lr. No. B/1861/92, dated 2-6-1993 of the Mandal Revenue officer and Lr. No. B1/4204/93, dated 29-10-1993 of the Revenue Divisional officer, East Ranga Reddy District, hyderabad.

( 3 ) OPPOSING the writ petition, the appellant authorities have filed counter- affidavit. In the counter filed by them, they have claimed that the writ petitioners names did not appear in the revenue records and that the claim of the writ petitioners that proceedings were issued assigning the subject land in their favour is not correct; under the Lavoni Rules, the writ petitioners could not have been assigned the subject land because they were not landless poor. It was also c






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top