SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 168

V.ESWARAIAH, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
P. Ananda Rao – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, A. P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner invokes the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court challenging the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad in o. A. No. 5843 of 1994, dated 18-6-1999 read with Rev. M. A. No. 2108 of 1999, dated 2-8-1999. The petitioner accordingly prays, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the said order passed by the tribunal as illegal, arbitrary, vitiated by non-applkation of mind and contrary to law laid down by the Supreme Court. The. petitioner accordingly prays for grant of appropriate consequential orders setting aside the order of removal issued in proceedings Rc. No. l2005/87/a7, dated 15-6-1992 by the third respondent-District collector as confirmed by the order dated 2-9-1994 by the second respondent-Commissioner of Land Revenue. The petitioner in effect challenges the order of removal passed against him dated 15-6-1992 by the third respondent and confirmed by the second respondent-appellate authority by order dated 2-9-1994.

( 2 ) THE prayer, in our considered opinion, is misconceived. The petitioner if at all could have prayed for issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records in O. A. No





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top