SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 220

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
V. L. Narasimha Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. T. Pentaiah – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant in O. S. No. 11 of 1997 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Asifabad filed this revision petition. The plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 2-7-1994 executed by the defendant in the suit. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff wanted to exhibit the said document dated 2-7-1994 as piece of evidence. The defendant objected for the marking of the document taking the contention that the said document is a sale deed and it requires to be stamped as a sale deed and the document is insufficiently stamped, and therefore, inadmissible in evidence. The learned Senior Civil Judge, by his order dated 29-9-1997, held that the document is only an agreement of sale and not sale deed, and therefore, it is not liable for further stamp duty. The document was executed on non-judicial stamp papers worth Rs. 100/ -. Questioning the order of the Senior Civil Judge, this revision petition is filed by the defendant.

( 2 ) DURING the pendency of this revision petition, the respondent-plaintiff died and his L. Rs. were brought on record.

( 3 ) THE question to be decided in the present revision petition is whe











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top