SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 584

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
K. Sreenivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Regional Director, Securities and Exchange Board of India – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner filed this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the transfer of Rs. 9. 76 lakhs shares in Fenoplast Ltd. the 3rd respondent herein the Company in favour of respondents 4 to 8 ( haridass family ), as illegal and violative of Regulation 10 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 ( the Regulations ) and seeks a consequential direction for restoration of those shares to the petitioner s family.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the company was floated in the year 1975 by three families, known as, Katta family, Haridass family and Gada family. The shareholding of these families was at 28, 25 and 47 per cent, respectively. The petitioner claims to belong to the Katta family, whereas respondents 4 to 8 are said to be from Haridass family. It is alleged that, as time passed by, the Haridass family started asserting and dominating over the other two families and ultimately the petitioner s family was left with no alternative except to leave the company. That resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding mou dated 27-9-1996 between the petitioner s family and t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top