SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 574

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
Pallicherla Suseelamma – Appellant
Versus
Kondapalli Sarojanamma (Died per LRs) – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed under Section 22 of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, against the order dated 7-6-2000 in CMA No. 7 of 1994 on the file of senior Civil Judge, Nellore, setting aside the order dated 14-7-1994 in RCC No. 23 of 1989 on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-Principal District Munsif, Nellore.

( 2 ) THIS revision petition is filed by the tenants. Smt. Sarojanamma filed eviction petition seeking the eviction of the tenants on the ground of personal requirement for occupying the petition schedule premises by her third son Murali (PW2) to carry on business in gunny bags. The tenants resisted the eviction petition taking the plea that the requirement of the landlady is not bona fide. On the basis of the oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties, the Rent Controller came to the conclusion that the requirement of he landlady for occupation for the business of her third son (PW2) is bona fide. However, on the ground that during the pendency of the eviction proceedings another tenant of the landlady vacated another shop room and it was occupied by another son of the landlady and as the la








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top