B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, V.ESWARAIAH
N. VEERRAJU – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Endowments, A. P. , Hydrabad – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner while workirtg as Deputy executive Engineer in the Endowments department at Kakinada was subjected to a raid by the officials of the Anti-Corruption bureau on 4-7-1997. Certain documents pertaining to movable and immovable properties were seized from the residence of the petitioner. It is not necessary to notice the details of the allegations levelled against the petitioner. Suffice it to notice that the anti-Corruption Bureau found the petitioner to have acquired disproportionate assets.
( 2 ) THE petitioner was transferred from Kakinada to Simhachalam of visakhapatnam District with effect from 13-6-1998.
( 3 ) THE Anti-Corruption Bureau issued notice to the petitioner on 7-11-1998 requiring his explanation in the matter for having assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. The petitioner accordingly submitted his explanation, inter alia denying the allegations levelled against him. It is also not necessary to notice the details of explanation submitted by the petitioner in this regard. The Government issued proceedings dated 9-7-2001 asking the petitioner to submit a written statement to the articles of charges to which the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.