SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 505

A.GOPAL REDDY
Barigala Sailu – Appellant
Versus
Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN these two writ petitions the Circular No. P. 14/2643/ir/188 dated 11-2-2000 issued by the 1st respondent and consequential charge-sheets issued for disobeying the instructions are challenged. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions is one and the same, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to filing these writ petitions are as under:

( 3 ) IN W. P. No. 1977 of 2001 the 1st petitioner is working as Head-Overman under the control of the 3rd respondent and the 2nd petitioner is working as Welder under the control of the 4th respondent. Both the petitioners are residents of Kothagudem town. While so, the 2nd respondent issued impugned circular dated 11-2-2000 imposing restriction on the employees of the Company from contesting in the elections to the Parliament/legislative Assembly/ Municipalities/panchayat Raj Institutions and other local bodies while continuing as employees of the Company. The said circular further states that if an employee wishes to contest in any of the abovementioned elections, he has to submit unconditional resignation before filing his nomination. It is also stated that the r

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top