SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 546

B.S.A.SWAMY, D.S.R.VERMA
GONDRALA SITHA MAHALAKAHMI – Appellant
Versus
PULIPATI RAJARAO – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THIS L. P. A. was filed against the decision of our learned brother Chalameswar, J. in p. Raja Rao v. C. Sithamahalakshmi (A. S. No. 1750 of 1985 and Cross-objections) wherein he has held that Ex. B-1 Will, on the evidence of its scribe, D. W. 3, in the absence of examination of its attestors, holds good.

( 2 ) THE facts are not in dispute. There was a registered partition between one Kotaiah, first respondent-first defendant (son of the said Kotaiah), the second defendant (wife of the said Kotaiah) and plaintiffs 1 and 2 (wife and daughter of one Ramlingaiah, the second son of the said Kotaiah) in Ex. A-3. Each one of them was allowed one share in the joint family property. Subsequently the said Kotaiah died intestate in the year 1970. The first respondent-first defendant and the second defendant took possession of the property that fell to the share of the said kotaiah without giving share to the branch of his 2nd son, Ramalingaiah. In those circumstances, the appellants filed O. S. No. 234 of 1979 on the file of the Additional subordinate Judge, Guntur against the first respondent-first defendant, the second defendant, and respondents 2 to 4 (defendants









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top