SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 758

S.R.K.PRASAD
Bhoom Raj – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioners who are the accused in c. C. (SR) No. 2025 of 2000 on the file of the judicial First Class Magistrate East and North ranga Reddy District and in Crime No. 55 of 2000 on the file of the Kushaiguda Police station, seek quashing of the proceedings by invoking inherent powers of this court.

( 2 ) BACKGROUND of the facts which are necessary for appreciation of the contentions are as follows: the first petitioner is the President of bhavanarishi Co-operative House Building society Limited, Hyderabad at the relevant time. The said society has purchased the land in question under an agreement of sale in the year 1984. Subsequently, an irrevocable general Power of Attorney was executed by kasula Balaiah i. e. , father of the 2nd respondent, who is de facto complainant in favour of Suryanarayana Murthy and T. V. Rama Rao, office bearers of the society and padma Rao vide registered GPA No. 1578/87 dt 16-11-1987. Pursuant to the said GPA the 2nd petitioner executed sale deed in favour of the society in respect of the land in question. In the meanwhile, the 2nd respondent de facto complainant and his brothers said to have sold away the property in question to third parties










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top