C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS in OS No. 68 of 1980 of the file on the Court of the subordinate Judge, Bapatla are the appellants.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, i would refer to the parties as they are arrayed in the trial Court in this judgment.

( 3 ) PLAINTIFFS (appellants) filed the suit, inter alia, for partition and separate possession of their 20/121st share in the properties specified in the schedules appended to the plaint, alleging that they are sons of the 3rd defendant Govardhan rao, the third son of Balakoteswar Rao who including their father 3rd defendant had four sons and two daughters i. e. , defendants 1 to 6, and that their grandfather balakoteswar Rao owned ancestral immovable properties viz. , houses at Ponnur and Bapatla shown as item Nos. 1 and 2 plaint A schedule besides properly shown in the plaint B schedule and business and other movable properties and that defendants 1 to 4, after their marriages, started living separately keeping the plaint schedule properties joint, and defendants 2 and 4 were carrying on business at Bapatla living in item No. 2 of the plaint B schedule, while defendants 1 and 3 along with their father were living at Ponnur do

Click Here to Read the rest of this document