G.YETHIRAJULU
Sammeta Tulasi Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A. S. No. 44 of 1985 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, krishna at Machilipatnam confirming the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 264 of 1975 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, machilipatnam.
( 2 ) THE appellants are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration that they are the owners of the suit schedule land and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 3 from attaching the plaint schedule property, crops raised thereon and for recovery of a sum of rs. 960/- from defendants 1 to 3.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs, the suit land was purchased by the father of the plaintiffs 1 and 2, S. Venkateswara Rao, under a registered sale-deed dated 3-5-1948. He was in possession and enjoyment of the suit land till his death in 1972. After his death, the suit property devolved on the plaintiffs. Since the plaintiffs 1 and 2 were serving in military, the 3rd plaintiff being their mother was managing the suit property. The 4th defendant is the wife of sri S. Narayana Rao, the younger brother of sri S. Venk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.