SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 669

G.YETHIRAJULU
Sammeta Tulasi Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


G. YETHIRAJULU, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A. S. No. 44 of 1985 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, krishna at Machilipatnam confirming the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 264 of 1975 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, machilipatnam.

( 2 ) THE appellants are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration that they are the owners of the suit schedule land and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 3 from attaching the plaint schedule property, crops raised thereon and for recovery of a sum of rs. 960/- from defendants 1 to 3.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs, the suit land was purchased by the father of the plaintiffs 1 and 2, S. Venkateswara Rao, under a registered sale-deed dated 3-5-1948. He was in possession and enjoyment of the suit land till his death in 1972. After his death, the suit property devolved on the plaintiffs. Since the plaintiffs 1 and 2 were serving in military, the 3rd plaintiff being their mother was managing the suit property. The 4th defendant is the wife of sri S. Narayana Rao, the younger brother of sri S. Venk





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top