SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 667

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : G.ROHINI, MOTILAL B.NAIK
Jyothi Education Society, Vijayawada - Appellant
Versus
Government Of A.P., Major Irrigation Dept. - Respondent
Decided On : 06-07-02

Headnote:

Writ Appeal – A. P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 – Sections 6, 7 and 15-A – Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – Section 116 – Allotment of lands – Lease – Petitioner-Society established an English Medium School at vijayawada named as Jyothi Bala Mandir high School, Vijayawada – Petitioner approached the Irrigation Department for allotment of lands in Vijayawada Town, Eluru Canal belonging to P. W. D. for release – On the basis of the recommendations of the Chief engineer, Major Irrigation/2nd respondent, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, issued g. O. . MS. No. 287, dated 13-3-1969 permitting 2nd respondent to lease out an extent of 1000 sq. yards to the petitioner-Society for a period of 25 years on a nominal rent of rs. 10. 50 ps. per plot per month and permitted the petitioner-Society to construct buildings – Government also issued yet another G. O. i. e., G. O. Ms. No. 1106, dated 16-8-1971 according sanction to lease out p. W. D. site measuring 1032 1/3 sq. yards in favour of the petitioner-Society for a period of 25 years on a nominal rent at Rs. 10-50 ps. per plot and also permitted the petitioner-Society to construct buildings – Government of Andhra Pradesh later issued memo No. 3338-S2/71-l, dated 17-9-1971 amending G. O. Ms. No. 1106, dated 16-8-1971 whereby the entire area situated between the site already leased out to the petitioner-Society and Kannada Seva Sangham in n. T. S. No. 627-A was allotted to the petitioner-Society – Thus in all an extent of 3283 sq. yards of land was leased out to the petitioner-Society by way of three different proceedings, dated 13-3-1969,16-8-1971 and 17 9-1971 respectively for a period of 25 years – Held, Since the respondents passed the order under Section 6 of the Encroachment act on 28-4-2001 without considering the objections of the petitioner, in order to meet the ends of justice, the order passed by the respondents under Section 6 of the encroachment Act on 28-4-2001 has to be set aside – Since this court have held that the notice dated 18-4-2001 issued by the respondents under Section 7 of the encroachment Act is a proper notice and the objections filed by the petitioner on 30-4-2001 have not been considered, this court permit the respondents to pass appropriate order in the light of the objections filed on 30-4-2001 by the petitioner to the Sec. 7 notice, according to law – Pending a decision by the respondents as directed by us, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner by the respondents – Writ Appeal is dismissed.

DR. MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant in W. A. No. 850 of 2001 and the petitioner in W. P. No. 9609 of 2001 are one and the same. During the course of hearing of the writ appeal, we suggested to the learned counsel for the parties that the writ petition could also be taken up for hearing along with the writ appeal so that the controversy raised in the writ petition could be decided. The learned counsel agreed to our suggestion and as such, the writ appeal and the writ petition are taken up for decision and we dispose of the same by the following common order: before we decide the issue raised in the writ petition, few facts are set out for proper appreciation of the case of the writ petitioner as well as the respondents. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to with their status in the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE writ petitioner-Jyothi Education society, Vijayawada was established in the year 1964 under Regd. No. 95/1964. The object of the petitioner-Society is to establish educational institutions. According to the petitioner-Society, it established High schools, Junior Colleges, Degree Colleges and Post Graduate Centres, which are recognized and affiliated to the Board of intermediate Education and other respective universities.

( 3 ) IN the year 1964, the petitioner-Society established an English Medium School at vijayawada named as Jyothi Bala Mandir high School, Vijayawada. The petitioner approached the Irrigation Department for allotment of lands in Vijayawada Town in n. T. S. No. 627/a, M-1/3-4 on Eluru Canal belonging to P. W. D. for release. On the basis of the recommendations of the Chief engineer, Major Irrigation/2nd respondent, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, issued g. O. . MS. No. 287, dated 13-3-1969 permitting 2nd respondent to lease out an extent of 1000 sq. yards to the petitioner-Society for a period of 25 years on a nominal rent of rs. 10. 50 ps. per plot per month and permitted the petitioner-Society to construct buildings. The Government also issued yet another G. O. i. e. , G. O. Ms. No. 1106, dated 16-8-1971 according sanction to lease out p. W. D. site measuring 1032 1/3 sq. yards in favour of the petitioner-Society for a period of 25 years on a nominal rent at Rs. 10-50 ps. per plot (at the same rate as was fixed pursuant to G. O. Ms. No. 287, dated 13-3-1969) and also permitted the petitioner-Society to construct buildings. The government of Andhra Pradesh later issued memo No. 3338-S2/71-l, dated 17-9-1971 amending G. O. Ms. No. 1106, dated 16-8-1971 whereby the entire area situated between the site already leased out to the petitioner-Society and Kannada Seva Sangham in n. T. S. No. 627-A was allotted to the petitioner-Society. Thus in all an extent of 3283 sq. yards of land was leased out to the petitioner-Society by way of three different proceedings, dated 13-3-1969,16-8-1971 and 17 9-1971 respectively for a period of 25 years. The 1st lease granted pursuant g. O. Ms. No. 287, dated 13-3-1969 expired by 13-3-1994; the second lease granted pursuant to G. O. Ms. No. 1106, dated 16-8-1971 expired by 16-8-1996 and the third lease granted pursuant to Memo No. 3338-S2/71-l, dated 17-9-1971 expired by 17-9-1996.

( 4 ) IT is the case of the petitioner-Society that after grant of the leases as indicated above, the petitioner-Society invested huge amounts and constructed pucca buildings besides providing furniture and other infrastructure with an expectation that the government would extend the lease period or permanently alienate the land to the petitioner-Society at a nominal rate or at free of cost as the petitioner-Society is involved in educational activities. According to the petitioner-Society, it made a representation to the respondents on 18-5-1990 with a request to extend the lease period. The petitioner-Society said to have received a communication on 18-4-1996 from the office of the District Collector, Krishna, calling upon the petitioner-Society to furnish certain informat
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top