MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) THESE three CRPs arise out of a common order dated 17-10-2001 passed in I. A. Nos. 1659, 2844 and 2845 of 2001 in O. S. No. 10 of 2001 by the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) SINCE these three revisions arise out of a common order, they are taken up together and are being decided by the following common order.

( 3 ) PETITIONER in these three revisions is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 10 of 2001 which is instituted under Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1 of CPC seeking the following relief s, viz. ,a) By declaring a portion of clause 38 (ii) of the Rules of BCCI after its severance to the extent which precludes, prohibits the plaintiff from calling into question the action taken by the committee as a result of an enquiry under the clause, in any court of law as bad, illegal, unconstitutional opposed to public policy; b) And by declaring the appointment of defendant No. 2 and report drawn up by him as null and void, contrary to the established procedure and ultra-vires. c) And by declaring the proceedings of the first defendant dated 05-12-2000 punishment and imposition of life ban there under duly communicated by the Secretary through his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document