SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 699

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
JAGADISH VALSHNAV – Appellant
Versus
FARPOS LEADING CATERER – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition filed under sec. 115 of C. P. C. is directed against the order dt. 10-3-1997. made in S. R. No. 327 of 1997 in O. S. No. 34 of 1996 and O. S. No. 232 of 1995 on the file of the learned Additional subordinate Judge, Rajahmundry.

( 2 ) BEFORE adverting to the question as to whether the impugned order suffers from any jurisdictional error or any infirmity, it is necessary to briefly notice the relevant facts leading to filing of this Civil Revision petition.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is the decree holder in O. S. No. 227 of 1995. The suit is decreed on 25-1-1996. He filed E. P. No. 65 of 1996 on 20-6-1996 for attachment of the monies of the judgment-debtor which are lying with the garnishee. The second respondent in this c. R. P. is the decreeholder in O. S. No. 234 of 1995 and whereas the third respondent is the decreeholder in O. S. No. 34 of 1996. The judgment-debtor in all the suits is the same.

( 4 ) THERE is no dispute whatsoever that all the four decreeholders including the parties in this C. R. P. at the relevant time got attached the amounts of the Judgment- debtor which were lying with the O. N. G. C by way of attachment. T
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top