SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 917

S.R.K.PRASAD
D. N. Rao – Appellant
Versus
Apple Credit Corporation Limited – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner invokes the inherent powers of this Court under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to quash the orders passed in Crl. M. P. No. 1384 of 2001 dated 4-5-2001 on the file of the II Metropolitan Magistrate , City Criminal Court, Hyderabad and also for necessary direction to accept the special vakalat filed by the counsel.

( 2 ) THE facts that led to filing of the petition can be briefly stated as follows. The first respondent herein presented a complaint in CC No. 257 of 2000 on the file of II Metropolitan Magistrate, Criminal Courts, Hyderabad for the offences punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner company, represented by its Chairman viz. , Dasari Narayana Rao.

( 3 ) THE Second Metropolitan Magistrate, issued summons to the accused/petitioner herein and after receipt of summons, the company engaged Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao as its counsel who has presented a special vakalat and a petition under Section 305 of Cr. P. C. vide Crl. M. P. No. 1384 of 2001 on the file of the II Metropolitan Magistrate , Hyderabad. Thereafter, the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, has dismissedthe same on 4-5-2001 on th














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top